Author(s): Mario Turchetti
Source: The Sixteenth Century Journal, Vol. 22, No. 1 (Spring, 1991), pp. 15-25
Published by: The Sixteenth Century Journal
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2542013
Accessed: 06/11/2009 14:38
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms andConditions of Use, available at
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisherregarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, andbuild upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
The Sixteenth Century Journal is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The
Sixteenth Century Journal.
http://www.jstor.orgSixteenth Century Journal
XXII, No. 1, 1991
Religious Concord and Political Tolerance in
Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century France
Universite de Geneve
The author analyzes the two historiographic concepts of concord and
tolerance as revealed in theological and political debates in France during
the sixteenth and seventeenthc enturies.I n particulara, n examinationo flegislativet exts from 1560u p to 1685r evealsa kind of alternationb etween
two attitudes of the government: a measure of relative toleration of
Protestant worship would be followed periodically by a measure of
concordo r religiousr eunificationu nderR omanC atholics upervision( the
revocation of the Edict of Nantes is the most important). In spite of their
similarity, concord and tolerance possesseddifferent historiographic
meanings and led to political programs that were quite different from each
other and sometimese ven opposed. In the work of historiographice xplanation
it is essential that historians distinguish clearly different types of
concord and tolerance.
THIS ARTICLE GIVES a general analysis of French sixteenth- and seventeenth-
century history in the light of two chiefhistoriographical concepts:
concord and tolerance. My aim will be to show how much this history is
affected by the alternation of the two notions. First, however, it is necessary
to offer some explanation of the exact meaning and usage of the terms
"concord" and "tolerance."
Let us begin by the older: concord. Of course, the foundation and the
maintenance of unity has been the goal of allsocial, political, economic,
legal, and religious institutions. Concord has always been sought by all
forms of government, and was even worshipped as a goddess in ancient
Greece as well as in the Roman Republic and Empire. Several temples were
dedicated to Concord.
Christianity naturally brought new dimensions to the concept: religious
and moral, particular to the new Christian world-view. SaintPaul
distilled his "good news" by maintaining doctrinal and religious concord.
"I exhort you," he says to the Ephesians, "to conserve the unity of the Spirit
in the bond of peace. There is one body and one Spirit even as ye are called in
one hope of your calling. One Lord, one Faith, one Baptism. One God and
Father of all. .. ." (Eph. 4:3-6).
We know that Christianity in medieval times...