El Regimen De Robert Mugabe

ROBERT MUGABE REGIMEN

Robert Mugabe Dictatorship on Zimbabwe


Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Marcela Cabrales. E-mail: marcelacarzola@hotmail.com

Abstract
On this essay we’ll talk about Robert Mugabe, is it a regimen? Or is it something that people had chosen? At first, the majority of the people elected Mugabe as a president; but it was almost 33 yearsago after the war between the whites and the black people living in Africa at that time.
We will discuss the actual situation in Zimbabwe, how is it in economics, in politics and their international relationships, also we’ll see where the corruption can take us.
And we’ll talk about dictatorships, is it a good way to manage a country?

Mugabe’s Regimen

On this essay I’m going toexplain a very singular regimen. First, this guy was seen as a savior, a man that liberates the Black people from the power that the whites ejected over them, the country saw hope on him. Many Africans considered him as a hero after the war between the whites and the blacks, so at first this Leadership sounded very promising but then when he finally arrived to the power all the things turned around andhe didn’t turned out to be the leader that they were expecting.. I’m talking about Robert Mugabe’s regime on Zimbabwe.
He has been the president of Zimbabwe since it became an independent country, on the next paragraphs we well discuss and see how a government that seem so great became a regimen and a dictatorship which is very interesting, we’ll talk about the economy, the Internationalrelationships and his career as a politician and we will see how the corruption can take to the decadence of an entire country. The purpose of this paper is to examine more closely this regimen and to learn more about it, to understand what is happening with our African Brothers, to learn about other cultures and the way that the power is ejected on those places.

To understand the politicsand economics of this land first we need to understand the background.
Mugabe came from a very poor family, his father abandoned them and his brothers died but Mugabe found company in books, so he started reading and becoming smarter.
On the 1960s he was the Secretary General of the Zimbabwe African National Union and then got arrested by the whites and became a political prisoner inRhodesia for more than 10 years between 1964 and 1974, when he was released he re-joined to the battle for Zimbabwe independence which ended in 1979, and in 1980 he won the elections and he has been the president since then, at first by choice of the people but not anymore. He has been doing reforms that change the official documents of the country, making him president all over again and committingfraud. In 2008, the year when Zimbabwe's opposition party, the MDC, won one election, their supporters were tortured and killed into withdrawing from the run-off.
‘’The difference between a democracy and a dictatorship is that in a democracy you vote first and take orders later; in a dictatorship you don't have to waste your time voting.’’ (Charles Bukowski, p.4) so yes in Mugabe’s regimen youdon’t choose you just follow the rules and if you don’t you’ll be tortured or killed.
As I see it African people at first identify with Mugabe they thought he will rise the African country, they really saw hope on him and I can understand that, a mean he was defeating black peoples rights and thanks to his help and the help of many others they could kick out the whites from Africa anddestroy their power...But is it better now? To leave one dictatorship for another it’s very sad to see how things turned out to be, because in the first 10 years of Mugabe’s precedence it was great, Zimbabwe searched for the cooperation of china and promote that the British farmers stayed in the country so Zimbabwe became one of the Major agricultural producers in Africa, and reduced the Illiteracy to...