Andres Es Gey
Páginas: 2 (286 palabras)
Publicado: 28 de junio de 2012
When future historians eyes again on the second half of this century just one of the most recurring words used to set their profiles will undoubtedly change the word, notevolution, but change. And radical change.
It will be seen, then, with crystal clarity, as the entire repertoire of traditions and norms, forms of relationships, values andprinciples through the first half of our century served as the conceptual and behavioral pattern among men collapsed with showy quickly, in a process that, for its speed, respond toan emergency seemed furious, a hidden slogan of destroying everything, to make way for a new historical stage.
For the philosophers of history, social scientists, inparticular, it is the task of unraveling the motives of this profound transformation. Some, by their notoriety accused have been identified. Example: the crisis of faith, that on theoccurrence, shattered all the scaffolding ethical religion, and left the way open to the permissive society and the various liberal movements racionistas that followed.
In anycase, among the distinguishing features of this change will certainly be noted, so surprising that we noted above, that of its radical, because it was change the root, withoutnuance or middle ground, with a pendulum motion so extreme that from one pole to the other pole was passed, producing as a result, the transmutation of the old values (whichPetrarch called "l, antica virtues"), by the negative values that now prevail in our day. Why, indeed, at present, but that values seem to live under the sign of the negativevalues of As in the past deserved rejection by its negative character against idealist conceptions that had society.
By way of illustration, and for further clarification of
It will be seen, then, with crystal clarity, as the entire repertoire of traditions and norms, forms of relationships, values andprinciples through the first half of our century served as the conceptual and behavioral pattern among men collapsed with showy quickly, in a process that, for its speed, respond toan emergency seemed furious, a hidden slogan of destroying everything, to make way for a new historical stage.
For the philosophers of history, social scientists, inparticular, it is the task of unraveling the motives of this profound transformation. Some, by their notoriety accused have been identified. Example: the crisis of faith, that on theoccurrence, shattered all the scaffolding ethical religion, and left the way open to the permissive society and the various liberal movements racionistas that followed.
In anycase, among the distinguishing features of this change will certainly be noted, so surprising that we noted above, that of its radical, because it was change the root, withoutnuance or middle ground, with a pendulum motion so extreme that from one pole to the other pole was passed, producing as a result, the transmutation of the old values (whichPetrarch called "l, antica virtues"), by the negative values that now prevail in our day. Why, indeed, at present, but that values seem to live under the sign of the negativevalues of As in the past deserved rejection by its negative character against idealist conceptions that had society.
By way of illustration, and for further clarification of
Leer documento completo
Regístrate para leer el documento completo.