Contratis

Páginas: 5 (1037 palabras) Publicado: 22 de junio de 2012
Cozumel, Quintana Roo, México 2 de Marzo de 2012







Mr. JAMES ELWELL.




In relation to the LABOUR LAW TRIAL promoted against you, JOSEPH ROGRE GAUVERAU and the person responsible for BOAT "THE FAMOUS" related to the number 56 Federal Board of Conciliation and Arbitration in Cancun, Q. Roo, Mexico which is processed under No. 105/2009,I inform you that, as youknow, the last day December 5, 2011 was issued by the ruling which concluded the trial indicated, it was resolved in his favor and the other defendants, absolving them from paying any and all of the compensation for unfair dismissal is claimed in the said judgment, as of overtime claimed and condemning only the legal entity to pay benefits generated by the worker for the provision of their servicesand that were due only, as explained below

As you remember the applicant promoted unfair dismissal by letter dated March 18, 2009, which claimed constitutional compensation, overtime work, wages, holiday and vacation pay for all time worked and bonuses, severance age at 20 days salary for each year of service and profit sharing for all time that worked, carrying out the trial for allits attendant legal because it was not possible to reach a settlement at that stage.

On December 5, 2011, a final judgment was made for you, condemning only the payment of the settlement for the time that he works, the payment of the proportions of holiday and vacation pay for the second year of services rendered by the actor and the bonus of 2009, benefits generated by the mere fact ofproviding the service and therefore can only avoid paying at trial establishing that have been previously paid such benefits. The above sentence was as follows:




Payment for the years he work: $2,680.62 pesos

Vacations: $4,136.61 pesos

Vacation bonus: $1,034.15 pesosChristmas bonus : $8,310.00 pesos




TOTAL: $ 16,161.38 PESOS.




For the calculation above, was taken into consideration that the applicant was an age of 1 year and 5 months, earned a base salary of $ 500.00 per day, plus commissions for each trip which gives us anintegrated salary of $ 1,150.00 which was the proven at trial, as well as other data on the demand and wages that are intended from the day after the dismissed is, of January 24, 2009, and conclude on the date it was issued on reference judgment, 5 December 2011.




Similarly in the resolution, and due to the counterclaim that we raised against the worker, demanding sums of money aswell as fishing equipment and appliances, you condemn the worker to pay you the amount of $ 2,900.00 U.S. ($ 37,700.00 pesos approximately) plus that he is condemned to the return of Penn brand cane and a 19-inch screen Sanyo brand and a Lap top brand 13-inch Dell. In this situation if you discount the balance due with the balance to favor the worker throws us, that the worker owes you the amountof $ 21,538.62 plus the return of the things mentioned above.




It is noteworthy that the result stated was achieved for the benefit to your favor of 100.00% of the risk of the trial date, which amounts to the sum of $ 1,098,885.62 (ARE: ONE MILLION NINETY-EIGHT THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED EIGHTY FIVE PESOS 62/100 MN ) and a credit balance of $ 21,538.62. Wich is detailed below:Constitutional compensation: $103,500.00 pesos

Wages Fallen: $598,000.00 pesos

Payment for the years he work: $2,680.00 pesos

Vacations: $4,136.00 pesos

Vacations bonus:...
Leer documento completo

Regístrate para leer el documento completo.

Estos documentos también te pueden resultar útiles

  • Responsabilidad por hechos de CONTRATIS hellip

Conviértase en miembro formal de Buenas Tareas

INSCRÍBETE - ES GRATIS