El Misterio Del Monstruo Del Lago Ness (Ingles)

THE LOCH NESS MONSTER MISTER
The term "monster" was reportedly applied for the first time to the creature on 2 May 1933 by Alex Campbell, the water bailiff for Loch Ness and a part-time journalist,in a report in the Inverness Courier. On 4 August 1933, the Courier published as a full news item the claim of a London man, George Spicer, that a few weeks earlier while motoring around the Loch, heand his wife had seen "the nearest approach to a dragon or pre-historic animal that I have ever seen in my life", trundling across the road toward the Loch carrying "an animal" in its mouth.
Avariety of explanations have been postulated by experts, over the years to account for sightings of the Loch Ness Monster.
Eels
A giant eel was actually one of the first suggestions made Eels are found inLoch Ness, and an unusually large eel would fit many sightings. This has been described as a conservative explanation. On 2 May 2001, two conger eels were found on the shore of the loch; however, asconger eels are saltwater animals and Loch Ness is a freshwater body of water, it is believed that they were put there to be seen as "Mini-Nessies".
Elephant
In a 1979 article, California biologistDennis Power and geographer Donald Johnson claimed that the Surgeon's Photograph was in fact the top of the head, extended trunk and flared nostrils of a swimming elephant, probably photographedelsewhere and claimed to be from Loch Ness. In 2006, palaeontologist and artist Neil Clark similarly suggested that travelling circuses might have allowed elephants to refresh themselves in the loch andthat the trunk could therefore be the head and neck, with the elephant's head and back providing the humps. In support of this he provided a painting.
Resident animals
When viewed through atelescope or binoculars with no outside reference, it is difficult to judge the size of an object in the water. Loch Ness has resident otters and pictures of them are given by Binns, which could be...