Escola

Anexo:Países por el gasto en investigación y desarrollo I+D
Saltar a: navegación, búsqueda
Ranking | País | Los gastos en I + D ( enUS$ PPA) |  % del PIB PPP | Año | Fuente |
1 | Estados Unidos| 405.3 | 2.7% | 2011 | 1 |
2 | China | 153.7 | 1.4% | 2011 | 1 |
3 | Japón | 144.1 | 3.3% | 2011 | 1 |
4 | Alemania | 69.5 | 2.3% | 2011 | 1 |
5 | Corea del Sur | 44.8 | 3.0% | 2011 | 1 |6 | Francia | 42.2 | 1.9% | 2011 | 1 |
7 | Reino Unido | 38.4 | 1.7% | 2011 | 1 |
8 | India | 36.1 | 0.9% | 2011 | 1 |
9 | Canadá | 24.3 | 1.8% | 2011 | 1 |
10 | Rusia | 23.1 | 1.0% | 2011 | 1|
11 | Brasil | 19.4 | 0.9% | 2011 | 1 |
12 | Italia | 19.0 | 1.1% | 2011 | 1 |
13 | Taiwán | 19.0 | 2.3% | 2011 | 1 |
14 | España | 17.2 | 1.3% | 2011 | 1 |
15 | Australia | 15.9 | 1.7% |2011 | 1 |
16 | Suecia | 11.9 | 3.3% | 2011 | 1 |
17 | Países Bajos | 10.8 | 1.6% | 2011 | 1 |
18 | Israel | 9.4 | 4.2% | 2011 | 1 |
19 | Austria | 8.3 | 2.5% | 2011 | 1 |
20 | Suiza | 7.5 |2.3% | 2011 | 1 |
21 | Bélgica | 6.9 | 1.7% | 2011 | 1 |
22 | Turquía | 6.9 | 0.7% | 2011 | 1 |
23 | Polonia | 6.9 | 0.9% | 2011 | 1 |
24 | México | 6.4 | 0.4% | 2011 | 1 |
25 | Finlandia |6.3 | 3.1% | 2011 | 1 |
26 | Singapur | 6.3 | 2.2% | 2011 | 1 |
27 | Irán | 6.2 | 0.7% | 2010 | 2 |
28 | Dinamarca | 5.1 | 2.4% | 2011 | 1 |
29 | Noruega | 4.2 | 1.6% | 2011 | 1 |
30 |Repíblica Checa | 3.8 | 1.4% | 2011 | 1 |
31 | Sudáfrica | 3.7 | 0.7% | 2011 | 1 |
32 | Portugal | 2.8 | 1.2% | 2011 | 1 |
33 | Ucrania | 2.75 | 0.85% | 2007 | 3 |
34 | Pakistán | 2.73 [1] Laplantilla {{ref}} está obsoleta, véase el nuevo sistema de referencias. | 0.67% | 2007 | 3 |
35 | Argentina | 2.7 | 0.4% | 2011 | 1 |
36 | Irlanda | 2.6 | 1.4% | 2011 | 1 |
37 | Malasia | 2.6 | 0.63%| 2010 | 4 |
38 | Grecia | 1.7 | 0.6% | 2011 | 1 |
39 | Hungría | 1.7 | 0.9% | 2011 | 1 |
40 | Tailandia | 1.46 | 0.25% | 2010 | 4 |
41 | Nueva Zelanda | 1.4 | 1.2% | 2011 | 1 |
42 |...