Feed Phase

FEED Phase
Engineering Design Integrity Workflow

Introduction
FEED Engineering Design Integrity Workflow (EDIW)
EDIW is AMEC’s best practice guidance to Engineering Managers and supporting personnel for the delivery of technical integrity. It is an ‘aide-memoir’ that highlights the key deliverables and activities throughout the lifecycle of a typical FEED project.
FEED is broken into sixphases: 1 Scope Definition and Engineering Execution Strategy 2 Commencement of FEED Design 3 Initial FEED Development and Hazard Identification 4 Initial Design Review & Audit 5 FEED Design Approval (AFD) 6 Final Reviews and Feed Report Compilation The workflow shown in the EDIW Road Map illustrates the execution sequence on a generic FEED Project. The vertical columns show activities that can beundertaken concurrently whilst the sequential flow of work is across the Road Map. As the deliverables and activities in each phase are completed, work can transition into the next phase. Situations will arise when work will need to be be done out of sequence, typically to meet a demanding project schedule. Use of the EDIW allows the risks of out-of-sequence working to be identified and the necessarymitigation strategies to be put in place. AMEC’s corporate governance and assurance of Engineering will measure compliance with the EDIW workflow and ensure out-of-phase working is being identified and managed. This document contains a copy of the FEED EDIW Road Map and includes detailed descriptions of the activities, the key engineering disciplines and supporting documentation.

1

Phase 1Scope Definition and Engineering Execution Strategy
Preparation for commencement of detail design. To evaluate FEED deliverables to ensure engineering is sufficiently mature for detail design to progress in a controlled and minimal change environment. To confirm Engineering Execution Plan.
Activities / Deliverables 1
Engineering Execution Plan & Engineering Organisation ChartPreparation/Validation of Conceptual Study Report/ BoD Project Baseline Standards

Description
Create Engineering Execution Plan complete with key supporting documents / information. Confirm maturity of Conceptual Design report. Identify any areas of concern and ensure these are captured on the Technical Risk Register. Establish which codes, standards and specifications are to be utilised, e.g.. Corporate,project, client, and confirm procedure. Include in Engineering Execution Plan and/or Discipline Job Design Specifications. Create formal schedule to identify when technical integrity audits, design reviews, HAZIDS, HAZOPS, etc are to be carried out. Align to Level 3 Engineering Plan and include in Engineering Execution Plan. Create formal Technical Risk Register identifying all possible risks associatedwith the engineering design. Agree engineering design tools to be used and confirm that system hardware, software and support is available. Include issues such as PDMS or PDS, Cats and Specs, survey methods, dimensional control techniques, etc. Document and record in the Engineering Execution Plan and discipline job design specifications. Establish status of project Quantitative Risk Assessment(QRA), Fire Risk Assessment (FRA) and Emergency Escape & Rescue Assessment (EERA) information and confirm methodology for timely delivery into engineering design process. Agree accountability for delivery, e.g.. Client, 3rd party, AMEC, and record in Engineering Execution Plan. Define the key project specific design parameters and operational constraints that are applicable to the appropriatediscipline for the detailed design of the project. To identify key individuals , roles and responsibilities, design tools, key codes and standards, etc. Agree work breakdown structure, develop CTRs and create level 3 integrated engineering plan covering all disciplines. To be included in Engineering Execution Plan.

Supporting Documentation

2

3

Engineering Baseline Standards, Document No....