Hola

¿WHAT’S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LITERATURE AND HISTORY TEXTS?
The text books can be written like you want; this can be anything what you want like: fantasticworlds, adventures, new lands, adventures, etc… The history texts are conserved to maintain the memories of our ancestors, these can say us what’s the difference aboutthe different things we think about and what conflict did it take to form a nation or the civilization now days.
The literature is the many ways the humanimagination can “fly”, this can be many things the people can talk but in a different way, they can express and explain things that if you talk cannot be explained god,these can show many histories that can origin many changes, extreme conscience of what the writer was thinking about what he wrote.
The history is a importantabout the records of the initiation of our culture and to think about what drastic changes do the people have take after wars, change of governments, invasion,acculturation, discrimination, etc… The history is also an incomplete record because there are many events, and the little details get lost, for example the Romans canbe more intelligent like the Greeks.
The literature and history can be combined, for example “the miserables” by victor Hugo occurs when waterloo battle is coming,and this can be classified like historical literature, so the literature is something that we can write whatever we like, but combining with historical records,but the only difference that that we can say that literature and history text are different about the way we think if these is literature or history by the records.