looooooooooool
Sin duda, Thomas Fuller se refería a que al dogmatico se le considera un inculto y al escepticista,sobre todo al modelo radical, un loco. Ahora, la postura que adopte cada uno está en su mano.
jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj-jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj-
jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj-
jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj-jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj-
jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj-
jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj-
jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj
jo “Lasuperstición hace al hombre necio, y el escepticismo lo convierte en loco”. Yo me pregunto ¿Es defendible el escepticismo? Es decir, ¿sería bueno aplicar la regla de Aristoteles de encontrarse en el medio delas dos posturas? Sin embargo, depende de que tipo de postura quiera adoptar. El escepticismo moderado se refiere al “hasta que no lo veo no me lo creo”, mientras que el escepticismo radical es“¿estoy realmente viendo esto? ¿me lo estoy creyendo de verdad?”
jo “La superstición hace al hombre necio, y el escepticismo lo convierte en loco”. Yo me pregunto ¿Es defendible el escepticismo? Es decir,¿sería bueno aplicar la regla de Aristoteles de encontrarse en el medio de las dos posturas? Sin embargo, depende de que tipo de postura quiera adoptar. El escepticismo moderado se refiere al...
Regístrate para leer el documento completo.