Retorica y Tablas De Argumentacion

Rhetoric and argumentation tables

|Appeals |Translation |
|Ethos |Ethical Appeal |
|Pathos |Emotional appeal|
|Logos |Rational Appeal |

|Canons of rhetoric |Translation / meaning |
|Inventio |Inventing|
|Disputio |Arranging |
|Elocutio |Style |
|Memoria |Memorizing|
|Pronuntiatio |Delivery |

|Type of oratory |description |Time |Topic |Means |
|Deliberative |Political, hortative, advisory|Future |Expedient and |Exhortation |
| | | |Inexpedient |dehoration |
|Forensic |Legal. Judicial |Past |Justice and |Accusation and |
| || |Injustice |defense |
|Epideictic |Demonstrative, declamatory, |Present |Honour and dishonour|Praise and Blame |
| |ceremony | | | |

|Syllogism term|Explanation |
|Major Term |Predicative term from conclusion(i.e term in the predicate of the |
| |concluding premise) |
|Minor Term|Subject of conclusion |
|Middle Term |Appears in both premises but not the conclusion |
|Major Premise |Premise in which major term occurs |
|Minor Premise|Premise in which minor term occurs |
|Conclusion |The last premise, drawn from previous 2 |

|Rules of syllogisms |
|The must be 3 and only 3 terms|
|The middle term must be distributed at least 3 times |
|No term must be distributed un the conclusion if it was not distributed in the premise |
|No conclusion may be drawn from...