Runoff, soil loss, and nutrient depletion under traditional and alternative cropping systems in the transmexican volcanic belt, central mexico

Páginas: 14 (3445 palabras) Publicado: 18 de enero de 2012
land degradation & development
Land Degrad. Develop. (2009) Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/ldr.953

RUNOFF, SOIL LOSS, AND NUTRIENT DEPLETION UNDER TRADITIONAL AND ALTERNATIVE CROPPING SYSTEMS IN THE TRANSMEXICAN VOLCANIC BELT, CENTRAL MEXICO
M. BRAVO-ESPINOSA1, M. E. MENDOZA2*, L. MEDINA-OROZCO3, C. PRAT4, ´ ´ F. GARCIA-OLIVA5 AND E.LOPEZ-GRANADOS6
´ Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrıcolas y Pecuarias. Campo Experimental Uruapan. Av. Latinoamericana Num. 1101, ´ ´ Col. Revolucion CP 60150. Uruapan, Mexico 2 ´ ´ ´ ´ Centro de Investigaciones en Geografıa Ambiental, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. Antigua Carretera a Patzcuaro No. 8701, ´ ´ Col. Ex-Hacienda de San Jose de la Huerta CP 58190, Morelia,Mexico 3 ´ ´ Facultad de Biologıa, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolas de Hidalgo. Ciudad Universitaria, Edificio B4, C.P. 58060, Morelia, ´ Mexico 4 ´ ` IRD-LTHE (Laboratoire d’etude des Transferts en Hydrologie et Environnement) Equipe RIVER (Rivieres, Erosion et contaminants) Domaine ` Universitaire 460, rue de la piscine 38 400 Saint Martin d’Heres, France 5 ´ ´ ´ Centro de Investigaciones enEcosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. Antigua Carretera a Patzcuaro No. 8701, Col. Ex´ ´ Hacienda de San Jose de la Huerta CP 58190, Morelia, Mexico 6 ´ ´ ´ ´ Departamento de Geologıa y Mineralogıa, Instituto de Investigaciones Metalurgicas, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolas de Hidalgo. ´ Ciudad Universitaria, Edificio U, C.P. 58060, Morelia, Mexico Received 14 July 2009; Revised 7September 2009; Accepted 6 October 2009
1

ABSTRACT ˜ In the Transmexican Volcanic Belt a traditional fallow system is practiced, called ‘‘ano y vez’’ (AV), which does not benefit soil conservation due to its low level of nutrient recycling and because soil protection is poor during the cultivation year. The objective of the present work was to measure runoff and soil and nutrient losses duringthree annual cycles (2002–2004) in Central Mexico under AV rotation and two alternative systems: improved traditional (IT) and traditional organic (TO). Soil losses in the three systems were moderate ( rest; however, this effect is only temporary, soil density being reduced once tilling is restarted. Lado et al. (2004) found similar results, mostly in soils with predominance of smectitic clays.Copyright # 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, (2009) DOI: 10.1002/ldr

RUNOFF, SOIL LOSS, AND NUTRIENT DEPLETION

Figure 4. Distribution of frequencies of rainfall intensity in the study area for the years 2003 (A) and 2004 (B).

Regarding the differences in runoff observed between furrow cropping (2002 and 2004) and seed casting (2003) (Table III), it can be seenthat the former resulted in a runoff corresponding to between 2 and 6 per cent of the annual rainfall, while in the latter (black oat) that percentage was larger (between 7 and 10 per cent). Analysis of the relation rainfall-runoff for the case of black oat cropping revealed that, irrespective of the type of management, runoff occurred whenever rainfall exceeded 7 mm with a maximum intensity of 12mm hÀ1 within a 10 min period. A series of hydrograms generated during a precipitation event which occurred on 26 June 2004, 18 days after sowing, was further analyzed (Figure 5). The rainfall event lasted 56 min (from 13:17 to 14:13) in which 22 mm of rainfall fell. The maximum rainfall intensities for 10 and 30 min period (I10 and I30) were 34.8 and 28.4 mm hÀ1, respectively. Previous soilconditions were as follows: soil water tension recorded one day before the abovementioned rainfall event was 0 kPa and the accumulated rainfall volume during the previous 5 days was 31.4 mm.
Table III. Runoff volumes (mm) and runoff coefficients (mm mmÀ1) for the three cropping systems assessed Crop/fallow year Annual rainfall (mm) AV R F, Bb: 2002 O: 2003 F, MB: 2004 Mean 899 725 1002 875 54 a 48 a...
Leer documento completo

Regístrate para leer el documento completo.

Estos documentos también te pueden resultar útiles

  • Comparison in accountacy systems: argentina and france
  • Understanding Replication In Databases And Distributed Systems
  • Drugs In Mexico, The Economy And National Security.
  • Review The National Accounting System In Mexico And Usa; Describe Similarities And Differences.
  • Sunnie And Shia And Their Origins In Iraq
  • Characterizing sources and remedies for packet loss in network intrusion detection systems
  • Traditional and nontraditional litigation
  • Indoctrination and resistance in the colca valley

Conviértase en miembro formal de Buenas Tareas

INSCRÍBETE - ES GRATIS