Strategias

Rubric for Case Study Assignment 


Criterion | 4

A-level qualities
(90–100) | 3

B-level qualities
(80–89) | 2

C-level qualities
(70–79) | 1 or 0

D- or F-level qualities
(60–69 or below 60) |
Completeness | Complete in all respects; reflects all requirements | Complete in most respects; reflects most requirements | Incomplete in many respects; reflects few requirements |Incomplete in most respects; does not reflect requirements |
Understanding | Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s) | Demonstrates an accomplished understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s) | Demonstrates an acceptable understanding of the topic(s)and issue(s) | Demonstrates an inadequate understanding of the topic(s) andissue(s) |
Analysis, evaluation, andrecommendations | Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of all issues identified; includes all necessary financial calculations | Presents a thorough analysis of most issues identified; includes most necessary financial calculations | Presents a superficial analysis of some of the issues identified; omits necessary financial calculations | Presents an incomplete analysis of the issues identified|
| Makes appropriate and powerful connections between the issues identified and the strategic concepts studied in the reading; demonstrates complete command of the strategic concepts and analytical tools studied | Makes appropriate connections between the issues identified and the strategic concepts studied in the reading; demonstrates good command of the strategic concepts and analyticaltools studied | Makes appropriate but somewhat vague connections between the issues and concepts studied in the reading; demonstrates limited command of the strategic concepts and analytical tools studied | Makes little or no connection between the issues identified and the strategic concepts studied in the reading |
| Supports diagnosis and opinions with strong arguments and evidence; presents abalanced and critical view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective | Supports diagnosis and opinions with reasons and evidence; presents a fairly balanced view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective | Supports diagnosis and opinions with limited reasons and evidence; presents a somewhat one-sided argument | Supports diagnosis and opinions with few reasons and little evidence;argument is one-sided and not objective |
| Presents detailed, realistic, and appropriate recommendations clearly supported by the information presented and concepts from the reading | Presents specific, realistic, and appropriate recommendations supported by the information presented and concepts from the reading | Presents realistic or appropriate recommendations supported by the informationpresented and concepts from the reading | Presents realistic or appropriate recommendations with little, if any, support from the information presented and concepts from the reading |
Research | Supplements case study with relevant and extensive research into the present situation of the company; clearly and thoroughly documents all sources of information | Supplements case study with relevantresearch into the present situation of the company; documents all sources of information | Supplements case study with limited research into the present situation of the company; provides limited documentation of sources consulted | Supplements case study, if at all, with incomplete research and documentation |
Writing mechanics | Writing demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, andcorrectness; includes thorough details and relevant data and information; extremely well-organized | Writing is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness and contains only a few errors; includes sufficient details and relevant data and information; well-organized | Writing lacks clarity or conciseness and contains numerous errors; gives insufficient detail and relevant data and information;...