Tareas

The free trade agreements in Mexico destroyed many sources of employment, which created and was a failure to stimulate economic growth in that country and that most companies in Mexico are foreign. Mexico grew during the decade of 1990 at the same rate as during the so-called lost decade of 1980, and half the pace of the 70's, when the model used was the import-substitution industrialization,rather than free market forces to accept Mexico's free trade agreements Mexico opened doors for other economies to come and develop their businesses in Mexico by paying a cheaper labor and taking theprofits to their countries of origin. 

The failure of trade liberalization, the cost of which have faced the rural poor, as noted by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)confirms the complaints of farmers' organizations and reinforces its demand that a review of the agricultural chapter of North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Otherwise, poverty, despair andhopelessness could lead farmers to take radical measures’’,’ asserted members of the Permanent Agrarian Congress (CAP) and the movement is at the breaking field. 

The signing of these free tradeagreements was thinking that this would bring prosperity and development but in reality has been of great disadvantage for Mexico is more marked if the treaty signed by Mexico, USA and Canada. 

Thosewho created the NAFTA treaty were intended to Mexico's economy grew at the same time or in the same way that countries that make up the treaty that did not happen, but do not take into account thatthese countries are countries that perfect way to operate where there is no unemployment and perfect competition. 

In addition to this because of the free trade agreements Mexican industries wouldhave to stop the government subsidies provided to support them in their production since the subsidy Mexico produces a lower price and would have a comparative advantage to  other countries. ...