Biofloc
Biofloc technology System design and management Application to marine shrimp Doug Ernst
NaturalShrimp AquaFarm.com
Pacific Aquaculture Caucus. Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture Workshop. Sept 14-15, 2010, Peninsula College, Port Angeles, WA
© Douglas H. Ernst (2010)
Further Reading
Waddell Mariculture Center (SouthCarolina) Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Clemson University Dept. of Agric. & Biol. Engin. (SC) Gulf Coast Research Lab (Univ. S Mississippi) Oceanic Institute (Hawaii) Global Aquaculture Advocate (www.gaalliance.org) Dr. Yoram Avnimelech (Israel Institute of Technology) Biofloc Workgroup Aquacultural Engineering Society www.aesweb.org
Animal Aquaculture Food Conversion
Fish 70% 67.0%FCE 22.3% FCE 1.5 FCR 4.5 FCR Feed
(for non-biofloc systems) Wet and dry weight food conversion
Moisture content: 10% Wet weight FCE: Dry weight FCE:
3X factor
Food conversion and “waste”
Wet wt fish: 1.0 kg feed 0.67 kg fish + 0.78 kg metabolites & solids Dry wt fish: 1.0 kg feed 0.22 kg fish + 0.78 kg metabolites & solids Protein nitrogen conversion (aquaculture average)
Shrimpprotein utilization efficiency: 20% Fish protein utilization efficiency: 25% 70-80% of nitrogen in feed is converted to ammonia (direct & via bacteria)
Biofloc Technology (BFT)
BFT is the utilization of microbial processes within animal rearing units to treat water and provide food resources.
BFT is used to Reduce Reduce water feed
Fish/Shrimp Rearing Unit •Internalized water treatment• “Waste” Biofloc food resource
Reduce waste
Reduce treatment
BFT: Advantages, Disadvantages, Issues
Advantages
Increased food and nitrogen conversion
Reduced water consumption, waste production, and treatment Simplification and cost reduction of facility design Improved environmental control and pathogen biosecurity
Disadvantages
Conditioning time for system start upOxygen consumption of biofloc Energy requirements for maintaining biofloc in suspension
Unique maqnagement issues
Maintenance of desired biofloc density, C/N ratio, and ecology Control of beneficial and harmful bacteria
Biofloc System: Tilapia
Clarification & denitrification
Feed: 32% protein Tilapia: final density 20 kg/m3
1
2
3
1. Clarifier effluent 2. Culture tank water 3.Sludge from clarifier
From Rakocy et al (WAS 2010) University of the Virgin Islands Agricultural Experiment Station
Biofloc System: Semi-Intensive Shrimp
Taw et al, Indonesia WAS 2009
Components of Biofloc
Components of biofloc
Solids: Inorganic and organic particulate solids
Bacteria and fungi: Heterotrophic and chemoautotrophic
Algae: Photoautotrophic and heterotrophicMicro-organisms: protozoa (amoebas, ciliates), nematodes, zooplankton.
BFT in a context of IMTA
The biofloc community and culture animal comprise a multi-trophic ecosystem:
Bacterial-detrital and photosynthetic food chains
Filter deeding detritivores and herbivores
Predator-prey relationships.
Biofloc Components: BDA
Bacterial-detrital aggregate (BDA) Combined cocci. rod, &filamentous bacteria Floc particle size 10 – 1000+ um
100 um
Ray et al, WAS 2009 Hargreaves and Wong, WAS, 2007
Biofloc Components: Algae
Pelagic and benthic diatoms, various green and BG algae
Kent et al, WAS 2010
Kent et al, WAS 2010
www.ucmp.berkeley.edu
LCB stain
Biofloc Components: Micro-organisms
Ciliated protozoan
Nematode
Daphina
Hydroid Planaria ?Vorticella
Biofloc System: Nutrient Pathways
Feed Ammonia Fish / Shrimp POC PON Food/nutrients Biofloc community Heterotrophic bacteria Nitrite Nitrifying bacteria
Fish/Shrimp Culture Tank
Microalgae
DIC DIN DIP
Nitrate
Biofloc removal: Denitrification:
Solid clarifiers & fractionators NO3 N2 and Alkalinity
Whole facility: 1.N & P removal: Macroalgae or halophytes 2.N...
Regístrate para leer el documento completo.