Boleto
Entrepreneurship & Regional Development
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tepn20
The success and failure of policy-implanted interfirm network initiatives: motivations, processes and structure
Robert Huggins Available online: 09 Nov 2010
To cite this article: Robert Huggins (2000): The success and failure of policyimplanted inter-firm network initiatives: motivations, processes and structure, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12:2, 111-135 To link to thisarticle: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/089856200283036
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/ terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone isexpressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or
costs or damageswhatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
Downloaded by [ ] at 08:39 14 September 2011
ENTREPRENEURSHIP & REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 12 (2000) , 111± 135
The success and failure of policy-implanted inter-® rm network initiatives: motivations, processes and structure
ROBERT HUGGINS
Department of City and RegionalPlanning , Cardi University, Glamorgan Building , Cardi CF10 3WA, Wales, UK; e-mail: Huggins@ cf.ac.uk
Downloaded by [ ] at 08:39 14 September 2011
This paper examines the processes and causes of inter-® rm network success and failure, de® ned in terms of the ability of networks to become a sustained and valued form of business activity for their members. The paper examines four di erent casestudy network initiatives: ( 1) a failed informal `new entrepreneurs’ network’ ; ( 2) a successful informal `local cluster group’ ; (3) a failed formal `defence contractors’ network’ ; and (4) a successful formal `small-® rm technology group’. It is shown that networks in business are often consciously developed and maintained by those managing directors who have recognized the importance ofco-operative activities for achieving competitive advantage for their companies. The best network support consisted of brokers who are able to mix and overlap the `hard’ business and `softer’ social interests of participants. The case studies indicate that it is formal groups that are the most potent form of inter-® rm network, but that it is through an initially informal structure that they are bestfacilitated. It is concluded that both economic and social rationalities are at play in the motivation of ® rms to join networks, and that their success is closely connected to pre-existing commonality between members. K eywords: inter-® rm networks; network brokers; social capital; trust; management.
1. Introduction Existing evidence suggests that the success or failure of public policy inter-®rm initiatives is related to a number key factors, such as the motivations and expectations of participants, coupled with the ability of initiative facilitators and brokers to create valued interaction and exchange between participants, and to instigate a `contact process’ within which trust relationships are generated (Chaston 1996 , Staber 1996 , Malecki and Tootle 1996 , 1997, Rosenfeld 1996,...
Regístrate para leer el documento completo.