Critica A La Filosofía Moderna

ADIÓS ARISTÓTELES, KANT, HEIDEGGER Y HUSSERL





CARLOS MARIO CARREÑO ARAQUE

10°

FILOSOFIA

COLEGIO LUIS LOPEZ DE MESA, EL CENTRO- ECOPETROL

BARRANCABERMEJA

AGOSTO 30 DE 2012


ADIÓS ARISTÓTELES, KANT, HEIDEGGER Y HUSSERL

CARLOS MARIO CARREÑO

FILOSOFIA

ABSTRACT
The intention of the present text is to compile some of the aspects approached in RobertoHernaez Rubio's writing, hereby my point of view expresses with regard to the critique that there is done he to the modern philosophy.
Which is the claim that does him to the metaphysics?, why does critique arise to the same one? Heidegger apparently hates the inheritance that they left the Greek thought us (Plato, principally) and the Christian thought, we owe to them the loss of course of themetaphysics, the metaphysical north is the entity in entity, nevertheless (for Heidegger) alone this is possible if there is understood the entity (what is) in the light of the being. But the modern philosophy tries to come to the being forgetting this premise, ignoring of the being. The modern philosophy forgot the being. Zubiri gathers the idea of the German according to the author to establish thebases of what will be his philosophy, nevertheless Hernaez Rubio us announces that alone it goes to reflect those ideas from which Zubiri departs and which somehow coincide with those of Heidegger.
The point that joins Heidegger with Zubiri is called " scandal of the philosophy, of which this scandal consists?: " To affirm the subjectivity, the conscience, doubting the reality of the being … Iforget of the being in benefit of the logical subject - representatively ". Heidegger blames of this to Plato's idealism, idealism that takes the royal-sensitive thing from the being, making it alone as intelligible. The being has turned hereby in logos, in idea.
Once it has been established of that it consists the critique that does him to the modern philosophy as philosophy of the conscience takesas a following step to analyze the fastened dualism - object as the oblivion of the own being of the modernity, moment in which the text tries to explain the importance that has the "world concept to carry out the break with the exposition of the idea of the knowledge as relation of subject - object.


ADIÓS ARISTÓTELES, KANT, HEIDEGGER Y HUSSERL
Por: Carlos Mario Carreño Araque

Elpropósito del presente texto es recopilar algunos de los aspectos abordados en el escrito de Roberto Hernaez Rubio, para de esta manera expresar mi punto de vista con respecto a la crítica que se le hace a la filosofía moderna.
¿Cuál es el reclamo que se le hace a la metafísica? , ¿Por qué surge la crítica a la misma? Heidegger al parecer odia la herencia que nos dejaron el pensamiento griego(Platón, principalmente) y el pensamiento cristiano, a ellos les debemos la pérdida de rumbo de la metafísica, el norte metafísico es el ente en cuanto ente, sin embargo (para Heidegger) esto solo es posible si se comprende el ente (lo que es) a la luz del ser. Pero la filosofía moderna pretende llegar al ser olvidando esta premisa, haciendo caso omiso del ser. La filosofía moderna se olvidó del ser.Zubiri recoge la idea del alemán según el autor para cimentar las bases de lo que será su filosofía, sin embargo Hernaez Rubio nos anuncia que solo va reflejar aquellas ideas de las que parte Zubiri y que de alguna manera coinciden con las de Heidegger.
El punto que une a Heidegger con Zubiri es el denominado “escándalo de la filosofía, ¿En que consiste ese escándalo?: “Afirmar la subjetividad, laconciencia, dudando de la realidad del ser… olvido del ser en beneficio del sujeto lógico - representativo”. Heidegger culpa de esto al idealismo de Platón, idealismo que quita al ser lo real-sensible, dejándolo solo como inteligible. El ser se ha convertido de esta manera en logos, en idea.
Una vez se ha establecido en que consiste la crítica que se le hace a la filosofía moderna como...