East Asia Political

It´ s remarkable how has Singapore growth in the last 4 decades, nowadays his GPR is compared only with economical super potential countries such as the UK, Canada, or Germany.
This of course hashappened because of Singapore´s mentality, as Lee Kuaw Yew says (Singapore’s Senior minister), the development in the country came as a result of an organization in the society, probably it can becompared with an upgraded American formula for development but without the lack of social values that has America like Drugs Issues, Guns problems, violence problem which lead to a breakdown of civilsociety.
In that order, the main objective in Singapore is to have a well-ordered society where everybody enjoys the freedom, but it’s super important to mark that there’s a difference between freedom inan organized country and the freedom in a non-organized one. The point is very easily to be understood, because freedom can be confused with anarchism.
“look after yourself, cultivateyourself, do everything to make yourself useful”, this is a Chinese expression that summary all this idea of east Asia progress, the government wont do what family is supposed to do, in difference of westernsocieties where government has became the perfect replacement of the idea of family, where they are practically responsible of the teaching of values to society, as well the word “QIJIA” which meanslook after family simply the understanding of how the eastern culture has became an very highlighted matter in the success of those Asian countries.
Regarding of the rigidity of the Asian model I cansay that every culture can adapt itself to anything it want, however that involves a fundamental change in some aspects of lifetime, for instance, the western society would have let go things likethe irresponsible freedom to and organized freedom where everybody in society can accomplish the enjoyment of all the freedom, why is that, that China or Japan shares ancients manners and are this...