Ftth
Julien Vincent head of very high broadband access marketing NExT
March 6th, 2008
agenda
1 2
what we have learned from our customer pilot
orientations for 2007-2008
2
agenda
1 2
what we have learned from our customer pilot
orientations for 2007-2008
3
more bandwidth for more services
HDTV with interactive programs, on multiple TV sets or PCsVOD movies and programs streaming or download video games on-line or download video blogs / online photos for digital cameras and camcorders online storage and back-up data security for consumers and SoHo's simultaneous and symmetrical usage powered by the livebox
4
Orange role is to meet customer demand beyond what ADSL-type solutions can provide, for mass market take-off in 2009
FTTHis enabling new usage patterns right now
fiber access ADSL access download at 8mbps upload at 1mbps
download and upload at 100mbps
copper lines eligibility : 8mbps / 1mbps around 65% around 25% 15mbps / 1mbps
full HD quality movie
30 Gb
40min
>8h
>66h
DVD quality movie
4.8 Gb
6min 30s
1h 20min
>10h
amateur quality video
800 Mb
1min
13 min
1h 40min20 photos with uncompressed 8M pixels
480 Mb
40s
8 min
> 1h
10 MP3 music tracks
5
40Mb
3s
40 sec
5 min
FTTH vs. FTTC (and FTTB)
Coverage
DSL
ADSL / ADSL2+
< 20 Mbps
window of opportunit y
VDSL2
< 100 Mbps
FTTH
100+ Mbps
FTTH is the most future proof solution
2005
2009
2015
FTTC
bandwidth / reachabilit y VDSL speed is 25 to 30Mbps for a 700 m distance to the street cabinet (average in France)
FTTB
VDSL speed is 50 to 100 Mbps when fiber terminates at the building
FTTH
100+ Mbps With FTTH, reachability is no longer an issue
cost
FTTC is less CAPEX intensive than FTTH, with ~35% less CAPEX in urban areas
FTTB saves on indoor wiring but requires active equipment installation in the building (with syndics’agreement)
FTTH is less OPEX intensive than FTTC since most FTTH active equipment is managed at MDF and a fiber in the sub-loops costs less to maintain than copper
FTTC CAPEX consists mainly of street cabinets, power supply and network equipment, which are not re-usable as part of a FTTH deployment
FTTC is less CAPEX intensive than FTTH, but reachability is not sufficient. As very few ofFTTC CAPEX can be re-used for FTTH, FTTC is not a ‘first 6 step’ to FTTH
which architecture should we use ?
1st customer
point to multipoint
1 fiber for 64 customers
64th customer
1 fiber for 1 customer
point to point
point to multipoint (on GPON) is the most CAPEX efficient (lower duct occupancy with less fiber) and saves OPEX at the central office, 7 with no foreseeablelimit in available bandwidth
customer pilot (june 2006 – february 2007)
5 cities in the Hauts-de-Seine Asnières-sur-Seine Boulogne-Billancourt Issy-les-Moulineaux Rueil-Malmaison Villeneuve-La-Garenne
all-included offer
100mbps symmetrical Internet access simultaneously 2 HDTV streams on TV and 1 stream on PC unlimited VoIP dedicated Web 2.0 portal on-site home installation and servicesactivation dedicated hotline
6 districts in Paris 3rd, 4th, 6th, 7th, 13th, 16th
€70 / month 14 000 homes passed 900 agreements with managing agents for collective buildings (“syndics”) 1 000 customers (7% penetration) less than € 5 m CAPEX
8
lessons learned from our customer pilot
customers
high level of interest for FTTH symmetrical bandwidth and reliability, with technical supportrequired for mass market adoption main applications are : HDTV, multi-access, photos, video, home working, sharing of user generated content key parameters are : lead time to get agreements from “syndics” lead time to connect and install customers on-site pilot helped define end-to-end roll-out processes in various habitations (old or recent apartment buildings, detached houses) 70% of customers...
Regístrate para leer el documento completo.