Reintergration In Defeat

INTRODUCTION
  Anyone who has experienced directly the functioning of the enforcement system, in particular the entire process that starts in the detention, torture passes, marks the completion of the
Appearing before the court and is still in prison, he knows how it is designed to defeat.
Imprisoned person, in order to reinsertarla faced consciously or unconsciously, or exterminate as ahuman being. Apart from this shredder function more or less effective in achieving rehabilitation, the fact is that it works blindly and mechanically because it is required by capitalist logic: the defendant reintegrate into society or exterminate critical as a person.


REINTERGRATION IN DEFEAT
  Reinsertarse mean re-inserted into something, in a place within a system where it was inserted andthen, it was, it left him. At first glance, all imagine that the rehabilitation of a dam or a prisoner is to re-enter what is called "society". But no language is neutral, every language has a load more or less strong acceptance of the established order, particularly in relation to key issues: power, sexism, racism, nationalism oppressor, and so on. If we spend debating reintegration withoutcritically analyze what is the insertion, we are falling into the trap system. The question is forced upon: Do what reintegrate into society, where, for what, at what price?

  It is no coincidence that the code of Hammurabi pay special attention to property, contracts and obligations of the family, production standards and criminal, and some
Initial issues of commercial law, or to the urgentneeds of a new ruling class. Nor is it coincidence that Dracón prosecution and punishment vagrancy with the same ferocity with which forbade revenge. Thus an initial response to the previous question: to be inserted into the law is to be within the mechanics of exploiting class, and gender, but also because by then national slavery came largely from the defeated peoples. Hammurabi legislates a lotabout how to control the slaves on the punishment, determines that the descendants of slaves owned slave. A key factor in this response is the emphasis on productivity at work, in the fight against truancy and low labor productivity, ie the defence of economic exploitation. Nor is it coincidence that Solon, in addition to other measures, regulating brothels to enrich the State, and to fight the"afeminamiento" because of the men needed good soldiers for the fledgling Greek imperialism.

  The law has not changed substantially in defending these goals: no attack
Private property, accept patriarchy produce more to the ruling class, deny the right to self-defense, agreeing to be cannon fodder of power, and so on. Insertarse in the State and the law turns out to be, therefore, accept thelogic of the ruling class, the way you do business, and in particular to accept the place at that logic holds everyone, not fighting it, not rebel against it . Reinsertarse is thus reverting to the order that came out, back to accept. A reinserted is, in that sense, worse than a convert in the Middle Ages, because it had become out of fear and interest to a religion that was not originally theirs,but that was accepted by pressures, threats and / or interests. The reinserted, on the contrary, returns with his head low to accept what they had rejected before, or is a sorry. The medieval convert had nothing to repent, reinserted into a repentant for life.

We were inserted into the system from early childhood, without waiting for us to decide.
We inserted through education and the wholesystem totalitarian and undemocratic to impose insertion submissive, obedient and passive, which complies with the rules and accept that even the most heinous injustices because so required by law and enforced by the State through its monopoly of the violence. Recall that since the inception of the state, he has sought to monopolize violence and disarm the people, but unable to definitively.
One...