Hola

Utopia, components and structure…

In response to the question about if liberalism and Marxism can be combined in some way I would definitely say that it is not possible. In the development of thisessay I will present arguments that support my disagreement with such combination. There is record of many philosophers and thinkers that tried to find the best method or theory to govern a nation.Based on power distribution, concepts like freedom or social organization, several doctrines were taken into account by quite a few governments. By presenting proposals based on different ideas,thinkers created two main opposing sides: liberalism and Marxism.
Liberalism is defined as “the nature of liberty, the place of property and democracy in a just society” which defends that a society mustbe free and equal not mattering the circumstances. “Liberals employ an argument connecting liberty and private property” and supported by this fact e can conclude that by being liberal each personshould be owner of his own property. We can add that having private property is an “effective means for the protection of liberty”. We can infer that if a society is considered to be liberal, the leadersmust attempt to accomplish every single step that is posited by liberalism. F.A. Hayek argues, “There can be no freedom of press if the instruments of printing are under government control, no freedomof assembly if the needed rooms are so controlled, no freedom of movement if the means of transport are a government monopoly”. That fact might limit our possibilities of creating a mutable liberalsociety by combining it with another totally opposing theory such as Marxism.
Karl Marx is “best known not as a philosopher but as a revolutionary communist” he was a nineteenth century thinker thatinfluenced many of the communist government and regimes during the twentieth century by creating a doctrine based on a religious structure “it has an answer to just about anything”: Marxism. “One of...