Hola

hWhat do you think are some of the reasons why linguistic egalitarianism [equality] and linguistic discrimination are under-discussed in the public arena?

People are so used to having thousands ofcommunication systems around the world that they feel the need not to focus on linguistic egalitarianism. Each language has it’s own phonological structures [ ex: Korean vs English] English consonantsounds do not exist in Korean

The main problem in the pronunciation of individual words lies in the reproduction of consonants. Several English consonant sounds do not exist in Korean. The mostsignificant of these are the /θ/ and /ð/ sounds in words such as then, thirteen and clothes, the /v/ sound, which is produced as a /b/, and the /f/ sound which leads, for example, to phone beingpronounced pone. Differences in syllable structure between the two languages may lead to the addition of a short vowel sound to the end of English words that terminate with a consonant or within wordscontaining consonant clusters.

There is such diversity within languages and the structure of languages (VSO, OSV)
That it would be extremely difficult to create one solid language universally.Language development begins at such a young age, that adapting a universal language would be practically impossible.
We are born with hereditary ways [manner of articulation] to pronounce words thatattempting to pronounce new words would be physically impossible.

Nowadays, society is so embellished in speaking about diversity in the form of cultural. What people fail to realize is that languageand linguistics is apart of the term ‘culture’. For some reason, when this topic is discussed,

What is interesting is I never considered the topic of “linguistic discrimination”. Unfortunately, Ialways assumed that language and linguistic interpretation was equally accepted throughout the world. Once I began to think about the topic, I began to recount how many times people have pointed out...