Reino Aymara
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp.JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained athttp://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=duke. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon,and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Duke University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ethnohistory.
http://www.jstor.org
AN AYMARA KINGDOMIN 15671 John V. Murra Smithsonian Institution It is common in contemporary studiesof the Aymara to find expressions of disappointment at the spare mention made of this people in the European chronicles dealing with the Andes (H. Tschopik 1946; LaBarre 1948). The area occupied by Aymara in pre-European times was much larger than it is speakers
today; their numbers could be counted in the hundreds of thousands, if not millions (Rowe 1947). While no overall Aymara politicalcohesion can be documented today, sizeable kingdoms are recorded: the Lupaqa, who are the subject of this paper, reported more than 20,000 households on what they alleged to be the last Inca khipu record (Table I). While some Aymara kings found their way into the chronicles, Tschopik was right when he complained (1946:512) that the [16th century] literature dealing with the Aymara is surprisinglymeager.' In part this is due to the Cuzco-centric orientation of the informants used by the European writers of the period. Most were members of the Inca royal dynasty who 'important provided what was essentially state, if not lineage, mythology. My argument, however, here as elsewhere (Murra 1961), is that much more information is available dealing with the local ethnic
groups defeated by theInca and incorporated into their kingdom, than has been utilized so far. In recent years I have published in Peru two such book-length 115
TABLE I
Ethnic composition of the 7 provinces, Lupaqa kingdom, according t which the lords presented of the number of Indians there had been times.. ." (Garci Diez [1567] 1964:64-66).
Alasaa Uru households ClU( UCUIO ACORA ILAVE JULI POMATA YUNGUYOZEPITA 500 440 figures 158 110 figures 186
Moiety Aymara households 1,233 1,221 unavailable 1,438 1,663 unavailable 1,112
Alaasaa Uru households 347 378 by moiety 256 183 by moiety 120
Moiety Total Aymara households Uru
households
1,384
1,207
847 818 1,070
1,804
1,341
414 293 381
866
306
Total number of household *includes *includes 153 households 20 households ofmitmaq from Chinchaysuyu. of mitmaq from Canas. Total number of Urtu Total number of Aymara
An Aymara Kingdom sources, visitas,
117
2 dealingwith quite different Andean groups. These are not but administrative chronicles, reports of inspections known as compiled in the field by royal Spanish officials in the first few decades after the European invasion. While all the questions on...
Regístrate para leer el documento completo.