América Latina, Escnearios Regionales

Latin America

Actually, Latin America is better than twenty five years ago, there are less dictatorships, and with the exception of Colombia, the civil wars had ended and a tense coexistence hadbeen replaced the antiques massacres. But, without counting the country of Chile, in any other Latin American country seems to have a real development in terms of macroeconomic and diminution ofpoverty or an increase of opportunities.

It is well known that without the Cuban dictatorship of Castro, and the supposed “democracy” in Venezuela, the rest of Latin America had elections, in order tochoose their presidents; also there are parliaments more and less representative.

But, unlikely than Asia, in Latin American the establishment of democratic regime didn’t bring any State Reform thatquitted one of the principal source of inefficiency that is known as the corruption. The corruption had a lot of effects on Latin America, such as quitting measures like the public sector’sprivatization that is necessary for a development in the country. Moreover, in Argentina in that time governed by Carlos Menem, and in Peru under the dictatorship of Fujimori, the privatization instead ofbeing used to open the free market and stimulate the competitive, they were operations that benefit only some kind of people and didn’t increase the country development.

There is another importantissue that affects Latin America: the insecurity. A country can’t develop and progress if their habitants feel and live in the insecurity. The insecurity is provoked by illegal industries, such as thedrug dealing, that had used the events in the country, sometimes more than the government, the globalization and the new technologies to develop and produce their operations and cover with supposed legallaws. Unfortunately in countries like Colombia and Mexico, the production and drug dealing keeps the economic with the rhythm it have, for example, it gives the maintenance of some companies, bring...