Comentario
Páginas: 80 (19932 palabras)
Publicado: 22 de noviembre de 2012
Lope de Vega EL PERRO DEL HORTELANO
This edition of the play is intended to be a reliable edition but is, under no circumstances, to be considered as a thorough critical edition complete with variant readings, extensive notes, nor any of the valuable expository discussion that is usually found in such. Those who would like to study the play or to comment on it with greater security than can beclaimed for this electronic edition should refer to one of the two modern critical editions of the work: the edition prepared by A. David Kossoff and published in Madrid by Castalia in 1970, or that prepared by Victor Dixon and published in London by Támesis in 1981. Either of these editions should be easily found in any reasonable university library. In them you will also find a bibliography ofearly editions and manuscripts available for the play, cogent discussion of the work as literature, and a suggestive bibliography of articles about this comedia. Dovehouse Editions published a fine translation of the play by Victor Dixon (AThe Dog in the Manger@) in 1990. El perro del hortelano has also been the subject of many studies that have been published since these two editions were prepared.These items may be identified by reference to the valuable ABibliography on the Comedia@ published each fall in the Bulletin of the Comediantes. A marvelous recent film, directed by Pilar Miró was made in Spain. One of the points the director made in preparing the film was that the original text of Lope de Vega was a lucid and performable text even in this modern media. That film is available oncommercially published video. It can be obtained on loan from the video collection of the AHCT by members of that association. The video tape collection of the AHCT also contains tapes of a production in English translation, AThe Dog in the Manger,@ as performed at the University of Dublin in 1986 under the direction of Victor Dixon and a second performance in English translation as performed bythe Kitsilano Theater of Vancouver in 1994 for the annual ASiglo de Oro Drama Festival@ at El Chamizal National Memorial in El Paso, Texas. Vern G. Williamsen June 11, 2001
EL PERRO DEL HORTELANO
Lope de Vega
Personas que hablan en ella: DIANA, condesa de Belflor TEODORO, su secretario OTAVIO, su mayordomo FABIO, su gentilhombre TRISTÁN, lacayo ANARDA, dama MARCELA, dama DOROTEA, damaFEDERICO, conde LUDOVICO, conde RICARDO, marqués LEONIDO, criado ANTONELO, lacayo FURIO LIRANO CELIO, criado CAMILO Un PAJE
ACTO PRIMERO
Salen TEODORO y TRISTÁN; vienen huyendo TEODORO: TRISTÁN: TEODORO: TRISTÁN: Huye, Tristán, por aquí. Notable desdicha ha sido. )Si nos habrá conocido? No sé; presumo que sí. Vanse. Sale DIANA 5 DIANA: (Ah gentilhombre!, esperad. (Teneos, oíd! )qué digo? )Esto se hade usar conmigo? Volved, mirad, escuchad. (Hola! )No hay aquí un crïado? (Hola! )No hay un hombre aquí? Pues no es sombra lo que vi, ni sueño que me ha burlado.
10
(Hola! )Todos duermen ya? Sale FABIO 15 FABIO: DIANA: )Llama vuestra señoría? Para la cólera mía gusto esa flema me da. Corred, necio, enhoramala, pues merecéis este nombre, y mirad quién es un hombre que salió de aquesta sala.)De esta sala? Caminad, y responded con los pies. Voy tras él. Sabed quién es. )Hay tal traición, tal maldad? Vase. Sale OTAVIO 25 OTAVIO: Aunque su voz escuchaba, a tal hora no creía que era vuestra señoría quien tan aprisa llamaba. (Muy lindo Santelmo hacéis! (Bien temprano os acostáis! (Con la flema que llegáis! (Qué despacio que os movéis! Andan hombres en mi casa a tal hora, y aún los sientocasi en mi propio aposento; que no sé yo dónde pasa tan grande insolencia, Otavio. Y vos, muy a lo escudero, cuando yo me desespero, )ansí remediáis mi agravio? Aunque su voz escuchaba, a tal hora no creía que era vuestra señoría quien tan aprisa llamaba. Volveos; que no soy yo; acostaos; que os hará mal. Señora... Sale FABIO FABIO: No he visto tal.
20 FABIO: DIANA: FABIO: DIANA: FABIO:...
This edition of the play is intended to be a reliable edition but is, under no circumstances, to be considered as a thorough critical edition complete with variant readings, extensive notes, nor any of the valuable expository discussion that is usually found in such. Those who would like to study the play or to comment on it with greater security than can beclaimed for this electronic edition should refer to one of the two modern critical editions of the work: the edition prepared by A. David Kossoff and published in Madrid by Castalia in 1970, or that prepared by Victor Dixon and published in London by Támesis in 1981. Either of these editions should be easily found in any reasonable university library. In them you will also find a bibliography ofearly editions and manuscripts available for the play, cogent discussion of the work as literature, and a suggestive bibliography of articles about this comedia. Dovehouse Editions published a fine translation of the play by Victor Dixon (AThe Dog in the Manger@) in 1990. El perro del hortelano has also been the subject of many studies that have been published since these two editions were prepared.These items may be identified by reference to the valuable ABibliography on the Comedia@ published each fall in the Bulletin of the Comediantes. A marvelous recent film, directed by Pilar Miró was made in Spain. One of the points the director made in preparing the film was that the original text of Lope de Vega was a lucid and performable text even in this modern media. That film is available oncommercially published video. It can be obtained on loan from the video collection of the AHCT by members of that association. The video tape collection of the AHCT also contains tapes of a production in English translation, AThe Dog in the Manger,@ as performed at the University of Dublin in 1986 under the direction of Victor Dixon and a second performance in English translation as performed bythe Kitsilano Theater of Vancouver in 1994 for the annual ASiglo de Oro Drama Festival@ at El Chamizal National Memorial in El Paso, Texas. Vern G. Williamsen June 11, 2001
EL PERRO DEL HORTELANO
Lope de Vega
Personas que hablan en ella: DIANA, condesa de Belflor TEODORO, su secretario OTAVIO, su mayordomo FABIO, su gentilhombre TRISTÁN, lacayo ANARDA, dama MARCELA, dama DOROTEA, damaFEDERICO, conde LUDOVICO, conde RICARDO, marqués LEONIDO, criado ANTONELO, lacayo FURIO LIRANO CELIO, criado CAMILO Un PAJE
ACTO PRIMERO
Salen TEODORO y TRISTÁN; vienen huyendo TEODORO: TRISTÁN: TEODORO: TRISTÁN: Huye, Tristán, por aquí. Notable desdicha ha sido. )Si nos habrá conocido? No sé; presumo que sí. Vanse. Sale DIANA 5 DIANA: (Ah gentilhombre!, esperad. (Teneos, oíd! )qué digo? )Esto se hade usar conmigo? Volved, mirad, escuchad. (Hola! )No hay aquí un crïado? (Hola! )No hay un hombre aquí? Pues no es sombra lo que vi, ni sueño que me ha burlado.
10
(Hola! )Todos duermen ya? Sale FABIO 15 FABIO: DIANA: )Llama vuestra señoría? Para la cólera mía gusto esa flema me da. Corred, necio, enhoramala, pues merecéis este nombre, y mirad quién es un hombre que salió de aquesta sala.)De esta sala? Caminad, y responded con los pies. Voy tras él. Sabed quién es. )Hay tal traición, tal maldad? Vase. Sale OTAVIO 25 OTAVIO: Aunque su voz escuchaba, a tal hora no creía que era vuestra señoría quien tan aprisa llamaba. (Muy lindo Santelmo hacéis! (Bien temprano os acostáis! (Con la flema que llegáis! (Qué despacio que os movéis! Andan hombres en mi casa a tal hora, y aún los sientocasi en mi propio aposento; que no sé yo dónde pasa tan grande insolencia, Otavio. Y vos, muy a lo escudero, cuando yo me desespero, )ansí remediáis mi agravio? Aunque su voz escuchaba, a tal hora no creía que era vuestra señoría quien tan aprisa llamaba. Volveos; que no soy yo; acostaos; que os hará mal. Señora... Sale FABIO FABIO: No he visto tal.
20 FABIO: DIANA: FABIO: DIANA: FABIO:...
Leer documento completo
Regístrate para leer el documento completo.