Miss
Páginas: 2 (329 palabras)
Publicado: 13 de septiembre de 2011
8. Thorne believes that virtue-based reasoning tends to inverse a decision maker’s propensity to make sound ethical judgments. Discuss how this process occurs.
Thorne explanation on pg 381top.
10. Anderson LLP was the auditor for Enron, WorldCom, Waste Management, and other companies that committed fraud. The company was forced to shut its doors 4ever after a lawsuit againstthe firm concluded that it had obstructed justice and lied the gover in Enron case. One thing Anderson had done was to shred docs related to its audit of E b4 the gov could get its hands onthem. Some in the profession thought the gov had gone too far given the facts and mediating circumstances including top mgt’s deception; others believed the punishment was unjustified bcoz mostaccounting firms got caught up in similar situations during late 1990s and early 2000s. what do u believe? Use ethical reasoning to support ur answer.
11. Explain how the elements of theethical domain in accounting and auditing created conflicting responsibilities in Enron case.
Ethical domain on pg 376
Case study 2.7 Milton Manufacturing PG402
Uses the 10-stepdecision-making model explained in this chapter and develop the alternatives to be presented to Milton. Be sure to select the optimum alternative and explain why you chose it from an ethicalperspective.
Case study 2.9 Phar-Mor case PG404
1. how do u assess blame for the fraud? That is, to what extent was it caused by Finn’s willingness to go along with the actions of Monus? What abtShapira’s lax oversight. Should the blame all go to Monus? What role did Coopers & Lybrand play wiz respect to its professional judgement?
2. use the ethics standards of the APES110 to evaluatethe actions of Finn and Cherelstein in the PM fraud. Did they meet their ethical obligations?
3. what is the ethical msg of PM. That is, explain what do u think is the ‘moral of the story’.
Thorne explanation on pg 381top.
10. Anderson LLP was the auditor for Enron, WorldCom, Waste Management, and other companies that committed fraud. The company was forced to shut its doors 4ever after a lawsuit againstthe firm concluded that it had obstructed justice and lied the gover in Enron case. One thing Anderson had done was to shred docs related to its audit of E b4 the gov could get its hands onthem. Some in the profession thought the gov had gone too far given the facts and mediating circumstances including top mgt’s deception; others believed the punishment was unjustified bcoz mostaccounting firms got caught up in similar situations during late 1990s and early 2000s. what do u believe? Use ethical reasoning to support ur answer.
11. Explain how the elements of theethical domain in accounting and auditing created conflicting responsibilities in Enron case.
Ethical domain on pg 376
Case study 2.7 Milton Manufacturing PG402
Uses the 10-stepdecision-making model explained in this chapter and develop the alternatives to be presented to Milton. Be sure to select the optimum alternative and explain why you chose it from an ethicalperspective.
Case study 2.9 Phar-Mor case PG404
1. how do u assess blame for the fraud? That is, to what extent was it caused by Finn’s willingness to go along with the actions of Monus? What abtShapira’s lax oversight. Should the blame all go to Monus? What role did Coopers & Lybrand play wiz respect to its professional judgement?
2. use the ethics standards of the APES110 to evaluatethe actions of Finn and Cherelstein in the PM fraud. Did they meet their ethical obligations?
3. what is the ethical msg of PM. That is, explain what do u think is the ‘moral of the story’.
Leer documento completo
Regístrate para leer el documento completo.