Fisica
Los afijos son secuencias lingüísticas que se anteponen (prefijos), se posponen (sufijos) o se insertan (infijos) en la palabra para modificar su significado.
Al igual que en español, las palabras en inglés pueden consistir de tres partes: la raíz (the root), un prefijo (a prefix) y/o un sufijo (a suffix).
* La raíz es la parte de la palabra que contiene elsignificado básico (definición).
* El prefijo es el elemento de la palabra que se coloca antes de la raíz. Un prefijo cambia el significado o hace una nueva palabra.
* El sufijo es el elemento de la palabra que se coloca después de la raíz. El sufijo cambia el significado de la palabra, así como su función (uso) y en muchos casos el género y número.
Los prefijos y sufijos se llaman afijos porqueestan unidos a la raíz.
El conocer los afijos, no solament pueden ayudarte a identificar el significado de la palabra, sino que también pueden ayudar a incrementar tu vocabulario en inglés.
http://homes.chass.utoronto.ca/~cpercy/courses/MorphologicalChange.htm
Morphology of English a fairly short subject
· relatively few inflections
PRONOUNS have more forms
· number: bigthing in EModE: implications of the eventual loss of thou
· OE second person singular form
· how does PDE cope with not distinguishing number in the second person?
· gender: which “person” distinguishes gender? 3rd
· are there any EModE 3sg forms that cause ambiguities?
· case: pronouns change shape to distinguish subject and object
· professor, but she/her
· are there any EModE changes that level or extend case distinctions?
· NOUNS
· some minor plural paradigms
· loanwords like cactus, -i
· to what extent are these productive?! Ask Zach!
· native: ox, goose, sheep
· healthy enough that the loanword moose entered the sheep class. Perceived analogy:
· similarmeaning: denoted an animal
· not dissimilar sounds: long vowel
· most nouns mark plural, possession with –s
· apostrophe can be discussed in the context of disambiguiation
· it’s the “productive” plural marker
· some words ending in –s have had that –s removed to form new singulars: loanwords sherry, cherry, native word pea
· specific kind ofanalogical change: a kind of folk etymology called back formation
· people assume that a word has a morphological composition that it didn’t originally have (root + affix, usually) and remove that affix, creating a new word: back formation
· e.g., the assumed model was the class of regular plural nouns ending in -s
· another model is agent nouns in -er
· -er usuallyadded to verbs to form an agent noun
· sometimes removed from nouns to form new verbs
· letch from lecher
· ADJECTIVES can mark comparative and superlative in two ways
· “periphrastic” strategy with more, most appeared in ME: most wonderful!
· variation in EModE: Millward’s exx are Shakespeare’s more bold and violentest
· inflections -erand –est native to OE: exx monosyllables older, oldest
· historically the inflections had caused mutation of the vowel before them (o to e from old to eldest)
· survives in a very few relics: elder, eldest
· restricted in meaning
· mostly subjected to levelling, analogical: forms reduced
· OE lang, leng-: from 2 to 1 -> long, longer, longest
· prompt them to cough up length and strength
· VERBS
· lexical verbs mark present 3 sg with –s
· I’m distinguishing these from modals (He will)
· OE marked it with –th
· Sidney’s poem “The nightingale” has convenient variation!
· originally regional: -s from the north
· by C16th, formality: prose, biblical stuff
· by...
Regístrate para leer el documento completo.