When selecting input optics for a measurement application, consider both the size of the source and the viewing angle of the intended real-world receiver. Suppose, forexample, that you were measuring the erythemal (sunburn) effect of the sun on human skin. While the sun may be considered very much a point source, skylight, refracted and reflected by the atmosphere,contributes significantly to the overall amount of light reaching the earth’s surface. Sunlight is a combination of a point source and a 2π steradian area source. The skin, since it is relatively flat anddiffuse, is an effective cosine receiver. It absorbs radiation in proportion to the incident angle of the light. An appropriate measurement system should also have a cosine response. If you aimed thedetector directly at the sun and tracked the sun's path, you would be measuring the maximum irradiance. If, however, you wanted to measure the effect on a person laying on the beach, you might wantthe detector to face straight up, regardless of the sun’s position. Different measurement geometries necessitate specialized input optics. Radiance and luminance measurements require a narrow viewingangle (< 4°) in order to satisfy the conditions underlying the measurement units. Power measurements, on the other hand, require a uniform response to radiation regardless of input angle to capture alllight. There may also be occasions when the need for additional signal or the desire to exclude offangle light affects the choice of input optics. A high gain lens, for example, is often used toamplify a distant point source. A detector can be calibrated to use any input optics as long as they reflect the overall goal of the measurement.
A bare silicon cell has a nearperfect cosine response, as do all diffuse planar surfaces. As soon as you place a filter in front of the detector, however, you change the spatial responsivity of the cell by restricting off-angle...