Padres Homosexuaes Poder Adoptar

Arguments:

* There is no proof that kids from homosexual families have any psychological or social issues. it`s more common for children from heterosexual couples to have psychological orsocial issues. And there are no proven studies that show that these children are in any way worst than the straight couples kids.
* Homosexual couples are more economically stable.
* Homosexualcouples are known to stay with the same partner longer than heterosexual, creating a more stable environment.
* Humans have the capacity o love which is something that no other animal can do. Soif gays have the opportunity to love a child who has no family, why shouldn’t they be allowed to adopt?
* 500,000 kids are in foster care, over 120,000 are available for adoption, in 2006 fewerthan 50,000 found a home because the process is very meticulous and sex orientation influences a lot. And average of 2,000,000 gays and lesbians met the requirements but were overlooked because of theirsexual orientation.
* But now, the vast majority of states no longer deny custody or visitation to a person based on sexual orientation. State agencies and courts now apply a "best interest ofthe child" standard to decide these cases. Under this approach, a person's sexual orientation cannot be the basis for ending or limiting parent-child relationships unless it is demonstrated that itcauses harm to a child. So if agencies and states are being flexible and are thinking in the children sake first, why don’t we do the same?
* Another important reason that we should consider is thatmany heterosexual couples prefer to adopt babies or infants, and often older children, or the one that have issues, or mentally disabled children, are left behind. And gays may give an opportunity tothis kids adopting them, so why don’t we first think in the children rather that in the sexual orientation?
* Gays are more educated and they provide better mental growth to children than...