Herbet Spencer

Herbert Spencer a positivist, not as we think.

Flavio Morales Vázquez
A01380614

Herbert Spencer, a philosopher born in 1820, a prominent evolutionist philosophy. Young never wanted to go tocollege and when rejection always big diplomas and appointments. Recognized positivist, causing controversy with what I thought because he was totally opposed to socialism is manifested as publiceducation, public libraries, industrial safety laws in if you think all of that was funded by the government had several works between most notably the study of education, social statics and psychologicalprinciples (1).
Throughout his life from childhood you could say this philosopher was raised and placed in Methodism from his mother, this will be what bases would think, considering that he came toconsider the culture of a civilization the limitation of freedom, did not read much had no contact so far from where he lived, this does not mean it was misanthropic, he excelled in counter this byloving conversation and attend the theater.
It was totally opponent of imperialism for all that was politics and socialism as mentioned despite being positivist totally lost interest in what the worldknown as classical Greek and Latin. He had a perfectly logical and rational mind, the only thing that satisfies he were so systematic elaborations, things that had an answer in math (1).
Disagreeingwith Darwinism, Spencer theories generated from studies of Lamarck.
You can find two main theories of the philosopher about how society is based on evolution. The first mention of any developmentsthat Spencer is reflected in the change of the natural and biological to social and moral. Defining so first man to appear for once this step to create a civilization that incorporates moral quality (2).Citing the second theory in which the author likens the society as an organism and saying that the company and the organisms grow during its existence and not after or before which to grow...