Improving Wikipedia´S Credibility

Wikipedia is a famous online encyclopedia in which somebody can see some data as if it was a paper encyclopedia.
This site has a free Done editing policy, so any user can add information about anytopic and here is where the problem arises, many people believe that Wikipedia loses accuracy because anyone can provide misinformation and create confusion and improper disclosure, others believethat this practice is very beneficial for the enrichment of information and exposure to different points of view, and they prefer this over hegemony and secrecy of the information narrated by a singleeditor.
Wikipedia really fight in a hard way by trying to balance the multieditation of the information and the entire veracity of this, by creating a policy of citations attributed to reliablesinformation sources.
The point is that it is not enough to ensure the authenticity of the data provided, as there have been cases of manipulation of the information, as has already happened is with over1000 articles by members of the U.S. Congress. This and the general thought that the quality of Wikipedia is neglected, even in some universities is prohibited using information obtained from thissource document.
Numerous studies and comparatives have shown Wikipedia has too many errors and no verified misquotations, which makes it an unreliable source. But really the idea of this format isvery good and innovative, because the information should be freely available and free for everyone so you can access to it quickly and efficiently thanks to the Internet.
I believe that Wikipedia is avery useful tool for searching information like a traditional encyclopedia, but we have to keep in mind that this is still a growing and under construction tool which lacks even arranges to make it a100% reliable source . Either way it makes me wonder if the information in a traditional encyclopedia is completely true and objective, it could be Wikipedia or a traditional encyclopedia is...