Empresa
Páginas: 2 (296 palabras)
Publicado: 8 de abril de 2012
State offers police extra DNA tool
SYNTHESIS
In this article they mentioned that in California they adopted the most aggressive crime fighting techniques in which DNAcontributes.
It is going to be a “partial match” so that they can found the criminal through their relatives in the database of about a million people, once the relative hasbeen identified they can use that person to lead them to their suspect.
This new plan makes California a leader in this kind of situations of solving crimes andidentifies faster a criminal or suspect.
There are also other states that are trying to make this kind of technology to resolve their crimes.
Brown emphasized that this is goingto be use only when the other leads are exhausted, he said: "We have 2,000 murders a year in California -- that is 10,000 since the Iraq war started -- and that is a lot ofkilling," Brown said. "When you see it and see the victims and have to go to funerals, it is pretty serious stuff."
But are some people who doesn’t agree with this newthings, Tania Simoncelli called this new crime fighting technique a disappointment and that they’re exploring the legality of this.
Jeffrey Rosen a constitutional law professorat George Washington University, warned: "I can guarantee if familial searching proceeds, it will create a political firestorm”
This is going to work like this: the lab isgoing to tell the police about DNA profiles that come up during the routine searches of California’s offender database and closely resemble, but do not match, the DNA left at acrime scene.
Then the lab will perform tests to determine the likelihood between the person who appears in the database and the suspect criminal.
JAVIER ZAPATA 40 BB
SYNTHESIS
In this article they mentioned that in California they adopted the most aggressive crime fighting techniques in which DNAcontributes.
It is going to be a “partial match” so that they can found the criminal through their relatives in the database of about a million people, once the relative hasbeen identified they can use that person to lead them to their suspect.
This new plan makes California a leader in this kind of situations of solving crimes andidentifies faster a criminal or suspect.
There are also other states that are trying to make this kind of technology to resolve their crimes.
Brown emphasized that this is goingto be use only when the other leads are exhausted, he said: "We have 2,000 murders a year in California -- that is 10,000 since the Iraq war started -- and that is a lot ofkilling," Brown said. "When you see it and see the victims and have to go to funerals, it is pretty serious stuff."
But are some people who doesn’t agree with this newthings, Tania Simoncelli called this new crime fighting technique a disappointment and that they’re exploring the legality of this.
Jeffrey Rosen a constitutional law professorat George Washington University, warned: "I can guarantee if familial searching proceeds, it will create a political firestorm”
This is going to work like this: the lab isgoing to tell the police about DNA profiles that come up during the routine searches of California’s offender database and closely resemble, but do not match, the DNA left at acrime scene.
Then the lab will perform tests to determine the likelihood between the person who appears in the database and the suspect criminal.
JAVIER ZAPATA 40 BB
Leer documento completo
Regístrate para leer el documento completo.