Hola

hsdfhsdfhy rnth ghdfngf dsgjdf hfjWindows vs. Mac: What platform is best?
When I see a Mac I fall I love. I compare the differences and obviously the price is the most remarkable. A MacBook Procosts 2199 Dollars, a Dell XPS with the same performance out of 1679 Dollars. In times of crisis, a Mac does not seem the most affordable option. What do I think? Sometimes I think to associate the costratio of a Mac to the cost living. I think the interesting thing here is performance. Obviously the Mac is more expensive than any PC in the same way that a Mercedes is more expensive than a Hyundai.Now the question is it is worth buying additional services that brings a Mac over a PC. And I mean topics such as security, lack of viruses, system stability, durability of equipment, qualitymaterials, design, power equipment.
I understand that the description of an equipment cannot be reduced to the capacity of the processor, ram memory, hard disk and so large of the screen. This would cancelthe difference between operative systems. In fact the advantage of Macintosh is more in software than in hardware. If I could afford a Mac, I will have the best performance but the Mac is not perfect,it have some problems. Even design errors, like putting the entrance of microphone and the exit of earpieces in the same port, or the adoption of the MagSafe connector, that nor is so safe, nor are socomfortable. As far as the operating system, I prefer that OS X is spectacular, but also exaggerates, and he is not much more fast that XP. Since Apple prevents that OS X works in other computers.Computers with a very good operating system. It is that sufficient one? For me, no.
All the computers have failures and in this question the list of errors and holes of security of Windows is moreextensive than the one of Mac. If OS X were never fail, the NASA would not need its own one putting satellites in orbit. We could follow this conversation eternally showing failures of both platform....