Prueba
MOSS, Pamela. Understanding the other/ understandingourselves: toward a constructive dialogue about “principles” in educational research. Educational Theory, Volume 55, Issue 3, pages 263–283, August 2005. Url:http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2005.00003.x/abstract
JUNEFELT, Karin. The dialogic impact on early language development and thought. Proceedings from the Second International InterdisciplinaryConference on Perspectives and Limits of Dialogism. 2009. En PDF.
ENGLUND, Boel. DRAKOS, George. REHN, Helena. SANDSTRÖM Birgitta. Skanwonius, Charlotte. “Dialogue” as guiding figure ofthought and as a phenomenon in school and working life. Proceedings from the Second International Interdisciplinary Conference on Perspectives and Limits of Dialogism. 2009. En PDF.LÄHTEENMÄKI, Mika. Two Faces of Originality: On the origins of the concept of dialogue. Proceedings from the Second International Interdisciplinary Conference on Perspectives and Limits ofDialogism. 2009. En PDF.
KÖGLER, Hans Herbert. The power of dialogue. Critical hermeneutics after Gadamer and Foucault. Massachusetts. MIT Press. 1996. URL:http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=m18qO_OgrpQC&oi=fnd&pg=PP9&dq=hermeneutics+%2B+conversation+%2B+dialogue&ots=ijYkF5XYT-&sig=b7zbNNcJV6HYAedAQ1w9oRsZyYM#v=onepage&q=hermeneutics%20%2B%20conversation%20%2B%20dialogue&f=false
COLTMAN, Rod. The language of hermeneutics: Gadamer and Heidegger in dialogue. Albany. State university of New York Press. 1998. URL:...
Regístrate para leer el documento completo.