Casa

D. Linton DM, Gilon D. Advances in noninvasive cardiac output monitoring. Annals Cardiac Anaest 2002; 5: 141-148.
D4. Shoemaker W, Belzberg H, et al. multicenter study of noninvasivemonitorigsystems as alternatives to invasive monitoring of acutely ill emergency patients. Chest 1998; 114:1643-1652.
D49. Tuman K, Gilbert C, Ivankovich A. Pitfalls in interpretation of pulmonary artery catheterdata. J Cardiothorac Anesth 1989; 3:625-41.
D50. Hansen r, Vignerat C, Matthey M, et al. Poor correlation between pulmonary arterial wedge pressure and left ventricular end diastolic volumen aftercoronary artery by pass graft surgery. Anesthesiology 1986; 64:764-70.
E. Van Der Water J, Millar T, Vogel R, Mount B, DaltonM. Impedance cardiography, The next vital sign technology. Chest 2003;123:2028-2033.
E13. Kubicec W, Karnegis J, Patterson R, et al. Development and avaluation of an impedance cardiac output system. Aerosp Med 1966; 37: 1208-1212.
E14. Sramek B, Rose D, Miyamoto A, et al.Stroke volume equation with a linear base impedance model and its accurancy, as comparated with thermodilution and magnetic flowmeter techniques in humans and animals. Paper presented at: 6thInternational Conference on electrical bioimpedance, Zadar, Yugoslavia; 1983;38.
F. Ventura H, Taler S, Strobeck J. hypertension as hemodynamic disease: the role of impedance cardiography in diagnostic,prognostic and therapeutic decision making. Am J of Hypertens. 2005; 18:26S-43S.
F55. Fagard
G.
H. Yung G, Fedullo P, Kinninger K, et al. comparison of impedance cardiography to direct Fick andthermodilution cardiac output determination in pulmonary arterial hypertension. CHF 2004;10(2): 7-10.
I. Raaijmakers E, Faes T, Scolten R et al. A meta-analysis of published studies concerning the validityof thoracic impedance cardiography. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999 (20);873:121-7.
J. Libby P, Ridker P, Maseri A. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2002;105:1135-1143.
J53. Ridker P,...