# Historia contante

Solo disponible en BuenasTareas
• Páginas : 6 (1287 palabras )
• Descarga(s) : 0
• Publicado : 10 de marzo de 2011

Vista previa del texto
Chemical Education Today

Ask the Historian

The Universal Gas Constant R
by William B. Jensen

Question Why is the universal gas constant in PV = nRT represented by the letter R? Donald R. Paulson Department of Chemistry California State University Los Angeles, CA 90032 Answer This is best answered by tracing the origins of the ideal gas law itself. One of the first persons to combineBoyle’s law (1662) relating volume and pressure and Gay-Lussac’s law (1802) relating volume and temperature in a single equation appears to have been the French engineer, Benoit-PierreÉmile Clapeyron (1799–1864). In his famous memoir of 1834 on Carnot cycles, he wrote the combined equation as: pv = R(267 + t) (1) where t is the temperature in degrees centigrade (1). In 1850, the German physicist,Rudolf Clausius (1822–1888), using the experimental data of the French chemist, Henri Victor Regnault (1810–1878), reevaluated the constant inside the parentheses and rewrote the equation (2) as: pv = R(273 + t) (2) and in 1864 he further simplified it (3) by substituting the absolute temperature T in place of the (273 + t) term: pv = RT (3) Being French, Clapeyron had attributed the volumepressurelaw to the French scientist, Edmé Mariotte (1620– 1684), rather than to Robert Boyle, and Clausius did not question this choice. Indeed, he explicitly proposed that the combined equation be called the Mariotte–Gay-Lussac law or the M–G law for short. Both Clapeyron and Clausius had used the volume per unit mass of gas rather than the volume per mole of gas in their equations. This meant that theirgas constant R was not universal for all gases but was rather a specific constant whose value varied from one gas to another and was, as Clausius noted, roughly inversely proportional to the density of the gas in question. In other words, just as the volume per unit mass and the volume per mole are related by the equation: v = V/m = (V/n)(n/m) = (V/n)(1/M) (4)

where M = m/n is mass per mole orthe molecular weight, so the universal gas constant R and the Clapeyron-Clausius’ specific gas constant (designated here as R′ to avoid confusion) are related by the equation: R′= R/m = (R/n)(n/m) = constant/M = constant′/density (5)

where by Avogadro’s hypothesis the molecular weight of a gas at constant PVT is directly proportional to its density (4). The first person to convert the specificconstant of Clapeyron and Clausius into a universal gas constant appears to have been Clausius’ student, the German chemist, August F. Horstmann (1842–1929), who in 1873 rewrote equation 3 as: (6) up = RT where p and T have their earlier meaning but u is “the volume of a molecular weight [i. e., mole] of the gas” and “R is the constant for the G–M law with regard to the molecular [in other words,molar] volume” (5). So why did Clapeyron choose the letter R for the constant in his gas law? The fact is that he doesn’t explicitly tell us why and we are left with two speculative answers: (a) it was arbitrary; or (b) it stood for ratio or one of its French equivalents: raison or rapport, since Clapeyron noted that the value of R for each gas was obtained by evaluating the constancy of the ratiopv/(267 + t) over a range of pressures and temperatures, a point also emphasized by Clausius using the revised ratio pv/(273 + t). Given IUPAC’s penchant for naming constants after famous scientists, this suggests that it might not be inappropriate to name R in honor of Regnault whose accurate experimental data were used by Clausius not only to correct the conversion factor between the centigradeand absolute temperature scales but also to evaluate the values of R using the above ratio (6). It is also interesting to note that Clausius was aware that Regnault’s data clearly showed that (2):
…the more distant, as regards pressure and temperature, a gas is from its point of condensation the more correct will be the law [i. e. the more constant R]. Whilst its accuracy, therefore, for...